On Wed, Nov 29, 2000 at 10:22:03PM -0500, Patrick Doyle wrote: >So, a few questions... >1) Is this behavior (of PeekNamedPipe()) a W9x bug? (That is, does it >work correctly on NT/2K?) I think you are correct. It is a w9x bug. I vaguely recall seeing this before. I can't think of any way to work around this, unfortunately. I remember trying things like zero byte reads on the pipe but they didn't do anything. The only way to trigger the EOF is to actually read from the pipe. cgf -- Want to unsubscribe from this list? Send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Why does scp leave ssh running? Patrick Doyle
- RE: Why does scp leave ssh running? Graham Bloice
- Re: Why does scp leave ssh running? -- select() ne... Patrick Doyle
- Re: Why does scp leave ssh running? -- select(... Christopher Faylor
- Re: Why does scp leave ssh running? -- sel... Patrick Doyle
- Re: Why does scp leave ssh running? --... Corinna Vinschen
- Re: Why does scp leave ssh runnin... Patrick Doyle
- Re: Why does scp leave ssh running? --... Patrick Doyle
- Re: Why does scp leave ssh runnin... Christopher Faylor
- Re: Why does scp leave ssh ru... Patrick Doyle
- Re: Why does scp leave ss... Christopher Faylor
- Re: Why does scp leave ss... Corinna Vinschen
- Re: Why does scp leave ss... Patrick Doyle
- Re: Why does scp leave ss... Christopher Faylor