On Wed, Nov 29, 2000 at 10:22:03PM -0500, Patrick Doyle wrote:
>So, a few questions...
>1) Is this behavior (of PeekNamedPipe()) a W9x bug?  (That is, does it
>work correctly on NT/2K?)

I think you are correct.  It is a w9x bug.  I vaguely recall seeing this
before.

I can't think of any way to work around this, unfortunately.  I remember trying
things like zero byte reads on the pipe but they didn't do anything.

The only way to trigger the EOF is to actually read from the pipe.

cgf

--
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to