On Tue, Jan 16, 2001 at 02:56:23PM -0800, Bob McGowan wrote: >Based on the man page for 'pwd': > > "...That is, all components of the printed name will be actual > directory names -- none will be symbolic links." > >I'd say this is a bug. I'd say that this has been discussed in the mailing list several times already. cgf -- Want to unsubscribe from this list? Check out: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
- /bin/pwd versus built-in pwd Fred Kulack
- Re: /bin/pwd versus built-in pwd Bob McGowan
- Re: /bin/pwd versus built-in pwd Christopher Faylor
- Re: /bin/pwd versus built-in pwd Bob McGowan
- Re: /bin/pwd versus built-in pwd Ehud Karni
- Re: /bin/pwd versus built-in pwd Christopher Faylor
- Re: /bin/pwd versus built-in pwd Christopher Faylor
- Re: /bin/pwd versus built-in pwd Fred Kulack
- RE: /bin/pwd versus built-in pwd Bernard Dautrevaux
- Re: /bin/pwd versus built-in pwd Ehud Karni
- Re: /bin/pwd versus built-in pwd Christopher Faylor
- RE: /bin/pwd versus built-in pwd Bernard Dautrevaux