"Larry Hall (RFK Partners, Inc)" wrote:
>
> At 10:52 AM 1/29/2001, Daniel Barclay wrote:
> >...
> >I thought GNU software tried to avoid arbitrary limit like that. Shouldn't
> >the only limit be virtual memory?
> >
> >That is, shouldn't bash keep reallocating (enlarging) its buffer until the
> >pattern has been expanding, or until it runs out of memory?
>
> I'm sure you can find your answer in the source if you're interested.
What's up with your attitude?
Daniel
--
Daniel Barclay
Digital Focus
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Check out: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
