At Wed, 7 Mar 2001 04:59:46 -0800,
Tim Prince wrote:
> I don't know why you would write an app to depend on the NaN behavior;
> you would at least have to forgo -ffast-math or supply and use your own
> isnan() and take other special precautions to make that work.
I don't write any programs now, but I read messages in
ruby-talk ML, and I found discussions about log()'s behavior.
If you are not busy, see the thread of ruby-talk:12112, URL is
``http://blade.nagaokaut.ac.jp/cgi-bin/scat.rb/ruby/ruby-talk/12112''.
--
Kenta MURATA <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> "http://village.infoweb.ne.jp/~muraken/"
--
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Check out: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
