Snapshots are built with debug symbols but the format won't be understood by Dr. Watson or VC++. You'll need to use gdb/insight. Larry At 01:35 PM 4/16/2001, Troy Noble wrote: >Fair enough. > >This is probably a FAQ. Are the cygwin1.dll snapshots generated >with debug symbols such that I'll get more information in my Dr Watson >reports? If not, do I need to build my own with VC++ 6.0 such that I >can pull up the debugger when (if) I get the access violations? > >Thanks for the information. Troy > >-----Original Message----- >From: Larry Hall (RFK Partners, Inc) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >Sent: Monday, April 16, 2001 9:33 AM >To: Troy Noble; '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' >Subject: Re: What's a good stable snapshot DLL? > > >At 10:45 AM 4/16/2001, Troy Noble wrote: > >Am having some relatively frequent Dr. Watson dialogs on Win2K and NT 4 > >SP6a. > >Access Violations. Using 1.1.8-2 version of the DLL from a "cygwin/latest" > >mirror. > > > >It's seems to happen in all sorts of places... echo.exe, make.exe, >bash.exe, > >basepath.exe. Seems to be somewhat random, in other words I can't >reproduce > >it the same way twice. And it only seems to occur on machines where I have > >cygwin on the d: drive instead of the c: drive. > > > >So am willing to try a snapshot of the DLL as is frequently suggested on >the > >list. > >My question is, what is a good stable version I can try (looking for >minimal > >risk if > >possible). Saw one reference to > > > >ftp://mirrors.rcn.net/mirrors/sources.redhat.com/cygwin/snapshots/cygwin1-2 >0 > >010411.dll.bz2 > > > >but that seems awfully recent. Is it generally safe using ones that recent > >given > >that these are built off of developer sources almost daily? > > >Snapshots are not generally considered stable. They are works in progress. >If submissions build, a new snapshot is created. If not, there's no >snapshot. Whether they "work" or not is determined by those that run them. >If you intend to try/use a snapshot, you should: > > 1. Backup any previous DLL/environment you have that you may want to fall > back to. > > 2. Be willing to try a few to see if they help solve your problems >without > creating others. > > 3. Report the results of (2). > > 4. Preferably be willing to help debug issues you find. > > >Larry Hall [EMAIL PROTECTED] >RFK Partners, Inc. http://www.rfk.com >118 Washington Street (508) 893-9779 - RFK Office >Holliston, MA 01746 (508) 893-9889 - FAX -- Want to unsubscribe from this list? Check out: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
RE: What's a good stable snapshot DLL?
Larry Hall (RFK Partners, Inc) Mon, 16 Apr 2001 10:31:44 -0700
- Re: What's a good stable snapshot DLL? Larry Hall (RFK Partners, Inc)
- Re: What's a good stable snapshot DLL? DJ Delorie
- RE: What's a good stable snapshot DLL? Troy Noble
- Re: What's a good stable snapshot DLL? DJ Delorie
- Re: What's a good stable snapshot ... Christopher Faylor
- Re: What's a good stable snaps... DJ Delorie
- Re: What's a good stable s... Christopher Faylor
- Re: What's a good stable snaps... egor duda
- Re: What's a good stable s... Christopher Faylor
- RE: What's a good sta... Bobby McNulty
- Larry Hall (RFK Partners, Inc)