> Unfortunately, blocking recv() calls are not interruptible on Windows. > I'm not aware of any mechanism for allowing this. Under windows two things will interrupt a blocking recv() call. The first is to call closesocket() from another thread. The second is WSACancelBlockingCall() which no longer exists in Winsock 2, but that is not a huge problem because cygwin is using Winsock 1.x. One note, WSACancelBlockingCall() was just a way of getting around the Winsock 1.1 rule that you couldn't call closesocket() when a blocking call was pending. So, closesocket() may have the same effect. -- Want to unsubscribe from this list? Check out: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
- SIGTERM does not stop backend postgres processes immedi... Fred Yankowski
- Re: SIGTERM does not stop backend postgres process... Jason Tishler
- Re: SIGTERM does not stop backend postgres pro... Fred Yankowski
- Re: SIGTERM does not stop backend postgres... Jason Tishler
- Re: SIGTERM does not stop backend post... Christopher Faylor
- Re: [CYGWIN] Re: SIGTERM does not... Hiroshi Inoue
- Re: [CYGWIN] Re: SIGTERM does... Christopher Faylor
- Re: [CYGWIN] Re: SIGTERM ... Randall R Schulz
- Re: [CYGWIN] Re: SIGTERM ... Christopher Faylor
- Re: SIGTERM does not stop backend postgres process... Parker, Ron
- Re: SIGTERM does not stop backend postgres pro... Fred Yankowski
- Re: SIGTERM does not stop backend postgres... Jason Tishler
- Re: SIGTERM does not stop backend postgres pro... Fred Yankowski
- Re: SIGTERM does not stop backend postgres... Christopher Faylor
- Re: SIGTERM does not stop backend post... Olivier Fambon
- Re: SIGTERM does not stop backend... Christopher Faylor
- Re: SIGTERM does not stop backend post... Fred Yankowski
- Re: SIGTERM does not stop backend... Christopher Faylor
- Re: SIGTERM does not stop bac... Fred Yankowski
- Re: SIGTERM does not stop... Christopher Faylor