At 10:46 PM 21/07/2001 -0400, Charles S. Wilson wrote:
>Marcus Börger wrote:
>
>>+freetype.2.0.4
>
>NO. this is included in the cygwin-xfree project. We shouldn't have two
>different (conflicting?) versions of the same thing.
>
>--Chuck
In that case, seeing as it appears to be useful for more than just X
applications, would it be worthwhile moving it from the cygwin-xfree
project to a package under the base cygwin distribution?
Still only one version, but a wider audience. Freetype compiled with no
actual source modifications once you'd frigged around with one of the
config files a bit IIRC, so unless there are some cygwin-xfree patches to
it that make is unusable otherwise, it shouldn't be too difficult.
E.
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
