Hi Andrej. > Or do you say that socklen_t is defined in some standard? This is different > matter. What I am saying is that are some problems with Cygwin "accept()" - maybe someone with appropriate expertise can consider them and act if necessary. Cheers Mike Thomas -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
- BUG - 1.3.n accept fails if NULL sockaddr * argument an... Mike Thomas
- Re: BUG - 1.3.n accept fails if NULL sockaddr * ar... Corinna Vinschen
- RE: BUG - 1.3.n accept fails if NULL sockaddr ... Borsenkow Andrej
- Re: BUG - 1.3.n accept fails if NULL socka... Corinna Vinschen
- Re: BUG - 1.3.n accept fails if NULL socka... Mike Thomas
- Re: BUG - 1.3.n accept fails if NULL sockaddr ... Mike Thomas
- Re: BUG - 1.3.n accept fails if NULL socka... Christopher Faylor
- Re: BUG - 1.3.n accept fails if NULL s... Mike Thomas
- Re: BUG - 1.3.n accept fails if NULL sockaddr * ar... Mike Thomas