At 10:31 AM 8/8/2001, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >Is Cygwin still inherently insecure on a multiuser system, or is this a FAQ >entry that hasn't been >revised in a while? If it's still correct, is there any way to lock it down Cygwin itself is insecure so anything built on it is inherently insecure, at the local level. At this point, there are no implemented options to address this issue. Larry Hall [EMAIL PROTECTED] RFK Partners, Inc. http://www.rfk.com 118 Washington Street (508) 893-9779 - RFK Office Holliston, MA 01746 (508) 893-9889 - FAX -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
Re: Silly question about OpenSSH and Cygwin
Larry Hall (RFK Partners, Inc) Wed, 08 Aug 2001 07:21:14 -0700
- Silly question about OpenSSH and Cygwin joshua . newton
- Re: Silly question about OpenSSH and C... Larry Hall (RFK Partners, Inc)
- Re: Silly question about OpenSSH and C... egor duda
