On Fri, 5 Oct 2001 16:23:52 +0400 egor duda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Single Unix Specification v2 says that "If buf is a null pointer, the >behaviour of getcwd() is undefined." >cygwin doesn't support this extension. it's arguable whether it should >be added or not. code that implicitly allocates (on doesn't allocate, >depending in parameters) memory on heap is a source of potential >memory leaks. Yes. It is understood. But, as for the program written like >>> char *cwd = getcwd(NULL, 256); as ISO C, a problem occurs in snapshot. Is this the thing of the problem which should cope with it on the application side? -- Yasushi HIGUCHI -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
