You are correct. gcj.exe et al are built buy default in gcc-3.0.x and 3.1 , but they don't work correctly.
-----Original Message----- From: Roman Belenov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, 26 October 2001 7:54 To: Billinghurst, David (CRTS) Cc: 'Sailesh Ramakrishnan'; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: unable to compile gcc 3.0.1 with java on cygwin Well, I've built gcc 3.0.2 without any special configure switches and gcj was built (file like gcj.exe in bin and jc1.exe in lib/gcc-lib/i686-pc-cygwin/3.02 were installed). I don't sure that it works (I'm not interested in Java myself), but at least it can be compiled. "Billinghurst, David (CRTS)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Yep. That is what we all get, even with gcc-3.1 from cvs. gcj isn't > ported > to cygwin (or any other platform). There has been some inconclusive > work > this year. Search the java mailing list archives at http://gcc.gnu.org > for > more information. > -- With regards, Roman. -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
