Christopher Faylor wrote: > On Thu, Nov 15, 2001 at 06:33:34PM -0500, Charles Wilson wrote: > >>But latest and contrib are going away, AFAIRC. Chris has a grand >>refactoring scheme where the packages actually live in a tree structure >>related to the primary category (Net, Base, Lib, Graphics, etc) >> >>right, Chris? >> > > I did talk about that once, didn't I. > > The current setup.ini builder can't deal with that but it would be trivial > to add, of course. > > I was going to give the new version of setup.exe some time before I made > any other changes, though. And, I have some infrastructure work that > I want to do too, like improving the cygwin packages web page.
Naturally. In your original emails on this subject, it was clear that (to me) that this was a tuit issue. I just wanted to point out that the idea of using "well installed.db sez it came from 'contrib' so it must be official" was not forward-looking enough. --Chuck -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
