--
Anonymous User wrote:
> > The video distributed by the authorities (same images on
> > rotation on all news progroms) shows newsgroups entitled
> > alt.sex.children and alt.sex.paedophilla, like that isn't a
> > stupid name for a group. Can anyone please verify if these
> > groups actually exist? (or have ever) I can't, Big Brother Is
> > Watching Me. It's safer if you do it for me, honest.
Steve Furlong wrote
> They're not on my ISP's list. The only group with a salacious
> name matching "*.children*" is alt.binaries.pictures.children,
> which I'm carefully not examining. "*paedo*" and "*pedo*" don't
> appear at all.
My ISP has:
alt.binaries.pictures.erotica.amateur.lolita
alt.binaries.pictures.erotica.child
alt.binaries.pictures.erotica.child.female
alt.binaries.pictures.erotica.child.male
alt.binaries.pictures.erotica.child.misc (perhaps for those children
that do not fit into either of the above categories)
alt.binaries.pictures.erotica.children
alt.binaries.pictures.erotica.early-teens
alt.binaries.pictures.erotica.early-teens.firsthair
alt.binaries.pictures.erotica.early-teens.hardcore (I downloaded a
couple of pictures from this. Yes, hardcore.)
alt.binaries.pictures.erotica.lolita
alt.binaries.pictures.lolita
alt.binaries.pictures.lolita.fucking
alt.binaries.pictures.lolita.misc
alt.japanese.neojapan.pictures.fetish.lolita
alt.japanese.neojapan.pictures.fetish.lolita.anime
alt.japanese.neojapan.pictures.lolita
japan.binaries.pictures.erotica.lolita
japan.binaries.pictures.lolita
japan.fetish.lolita
japan2nd.binaries.pictures.erotica.lolita
However, it has no such group as alt.sex.pedophilia.
--digsig
James A. Donald
6YeGpsZR+nOTh/cGwvITnSR3TdzclVpR0+pr3YYQdkG
ey+UP/2e94ib/cBL1UgbLbSBPjlZm7dOF1SQBrQ/
4I6Zte38OJdBpZqk7GBRqkOSMAdwzizE7S7sFr410
