On Saturday, May 4, 2002, at 11:23  AM, Jan Dobrucki wrote:
> I was thiking about connecting these technologies together, like PGP
> and fingerprints. Your fingers would be the PGP key. I know all my
> ideas are a liitle wild, but is it worthwile?

Again, why would you use a _public_ key technology when what you are 
doing doesn't need a public key approach?

Keyless doorlocks are already common in American and European cars. The 
keys are defeatable with enough attempts, but the solution is to 
increase key length if this is thought to be a problem, not throw out 
symmetric keys in favor of asymmetric, or PK, approaches which buy 
nothing and are more expensive to implement.

Smashing a window is still easy, so increasing key length isn't a 
pressing problem (key length is not the weakest link).

> I think that the world
> will be a very dangerous place, so I think that everyone who wants to
> should have the possibility of having high security.

You haven't this threw with any kind of even moderately rigorous 
thinking.

But, hey, if people want to pay the extra money for a PGP-based lock, 
which buys them nothing over existing locks and existing breakable 
windows, cool.

>  I wasn't just
> thinking of cars. Similar things can be done with houses, boats,
> whatever. So I'm a little paranoid, and I think that everyone is
> spying on me, aren't such people called perceptive?
>

You claimed, if I recall correctly, that you have been reading the list 
since 1998. I find this hard to believe. If you were reading it, you 
weren't paying much attention.


--Tim May
--
Timothy C. May         [EMAIL PROTECTED]        Corralitos, California
Political: Co-founder Cypherpunks/crypto anarchy/Cyphernomicon
Technical: physics/soft errors/Smalltalk/Squeak/ML/agents/games/Go
Personal: b.1951/UCSB/Intel '74-'86/retired/investor/motorcycles/guns
Recent interests: category theory, toposes, algebraic topology

Reply via email to