--
On 15 Aug 2002 at 15:26, AARG! Anonymous wrote:
> Basically I agree with Adam's analysis.  At this point I 
> think he understands the spec equally as well as I do.  He 
> has a good point about the Privacy CA key being another 
> security weakness that could break the whole system.  It 
> would be good to consider how exactly that problem could be 
> eliminated using more sophisticated crypto.

Lucky claims to have pointed this out two years ago, proposed 
more sophisticated crypto, and received a hostile reception.

Which leads me to suspect that the capability of the powerful 
to break the system is a designed in feature.  

    --digsig
         James A. Donald
     6YeGpsZR+nOTh/cGwvITnSR3TdzclVpR0+pr3YYQdkG
     JjoH8U8qZ1eOdT/yGjfV7Xz9andBZPeYWaOLC+NP
     2/OJG2MZSnAqcyuvUsNZTsQAcffGGST6LJ7e9vFbK

Reply via email to