OK, the following addition is a little "cleaner" than the 1st edition.
My fellow Cypherpunks, Lucky Green says: >AFICT, the proposed algorithm is for a test for primality and does not >represent an algorithm to factor composites. Well, pardon me! I was in a hurry and should have proof read. As a "save", however, I did put a question mark at the end :-) Yours Truly, Gary Jeffers Beat State!!! And the other oppressors.
