hi, --- Jim Choate <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: hi, > > On Sat, 30 Nov 2002, Peter Fairbrother wrote: >
> > > Godel didn't invent the term though, and may not > have said "this is the/my > > definition of completeness". I haven't read them > for some time, and can't > > remember. He may well have assumed his readers > would already know it. We can't define completeness. > > Of course he didn't, he just made it irrelevant > since you can't prove the > truthfullness of all the propositions requird to > prove completeness. > > Bottom line, mathematics may be complete but until > somebody invents a > meta-mathematics broader than mathematics it will > remain -an unprovable > proposition within mathematics, even in principle.- > Mathametics is always incomplete,always. Regards Sarath. > Adios. > > > -- > > ____________________________________________________________________ > > We don't see things as they are, > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > we see them as we are. > www.ssz.com > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Anais Nin > www.open-forge.org > > > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > __________________________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now. http://mailplus.yahoo.com
