It would be interesting to see if, at some point, a judicial estoppel argument could be made against the government based on argumentative pleadings in prior litigation the next time a "different" states rights argument is at issue.

Eric Murray wrote:
On Fri, Jan 31, 2003 at 04:50:00PM -0800, Eric Cordian wrote:

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,77234,00.html

The Feebs are crowing over their latest victory, having just obtained a
conviction against a medical marijuana grower for the city of Oakland.

They went after Ed Rosenthal because he is the author of
a popular book on growing dope.



"There is no such thing as medical marijuana," said Richard Meyer, a DEA spokesman. "We're Americans first, Californians second."

Interesting how selective the "states rights" crowd in Washington is.

Eric


--
Charles Lee Mudd Jr.
Principal and Attorney
Law Offices of Charles Lee Mudd Jr.
4710 North Virginia Avenue
Chicago, Illinois 60625
773-271-7600
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.muddlawoffices.com

President and Attorney
Privacy Resolutions P.C.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.privacyresolutions.com

President
Privacy Innovations Inc.
http://www.privacyinnovations.com

Adjunct Professor
John Marshall Law School

President, Board of Directors
American Theater Company
http://www.atcweb.org
http://www.quaketheplay.com

Reply via email to