-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Thu, Mar 06, 2003 at 11:22:19AM -0600, Harmon Seaver wrote: > hmmmm -- wonder what those "dirty" words were?
Did you use one of the FCC seven? In any case, I was at first a bit irritated to get these. Okay, I'm still irritated, but it's interesting, because it means that whoever at the patent office has decided s/he needs to monitor cypherpunks is self-censoring their input. Which means if you don't want them to see your cypherpunks post, you've got a decent chance at it by just saying fuck in it somewhere. Seems like poor planning to me. As for the unsolicited responses to list posting... accusing the US gov't of bad netiquette is sort of like accusing a three-year-old of bad table manners. It's true, but it isn't going to get you anywhere till the accused grows up a bit. - -- gabriel rosenkoetter [EMAIL PROTECTED] -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (NetBSD) iD8DBQE+Z4Y+9ehacAz5CRoRAokEAJwJpsqnVX30InQPzaIo3PDPP3OFkACgmmTh FRxkMDiNdtZV61+oeml0yHA= =duRK -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
