On Thu, Apr 22, 2004 at 01:13:48AM +0100, Dave Howe wrote:

> No, it is a terrible situation.
> It establishes a legal requirement that communications *not* be private from
> the feds. from there, it is just a small step to defining encryption as a
> deliberate attempt to circumvent that law, and so a crime in itself.

Are you truly expecting a worldwide ban on encryption? How do you prove
somebody is using encryption on a steganographic channel?

-- 
Eugen* Leitl <a href="http://leitl.org";>leitl</a>
______________________________________________________________
ICBM: 48.07078, 11.61144            http://www.leitl.org
8B29F6BE: 099D 78BA 2FD3 B014 B08A  7779 75B0 2443 8B29 F6BE
http://moleculardevices.org         http://nanomachines.net

Attachment: pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to