On Wed, Aug 04, 2004 at 04:44:58PM -0400, Jack Lloyd wrote: > If I did my unit conversions right, such a disk would be over 30,000 miles in
Drexler's estimate for computers are coservative (purely mechanical rod logic). SWNT-based reversible logic (in spintronics? even utilizing nontrivial amounts of entangled electron spins in solid state qubits for specific codes?) could do a lot better. So today's secrets perhaps won't be in a few decades. What else is new? Rather, who's passphrase has 128 bits of pure entropy? Certainly not mine. So the weakest link is elsewhere. > diameter. So we'll probably get some advance notice - "Hey, what's that big-ass > thing orbiting around the Moon?" By that time the question is rather "do you think that's air you're breathing?" Check out some of the stuff on http://moleculardevices.org/ you might get a surprise. -- Eugen* Leitl <a href="http://leitl.org">leitl</a> ______________________________________________________________ ICBM: 48.07078, 11.61144 http://www.leitl.org 8B29F6BE: 099D 78BA 2FD3 B014 B08A 7779 75B0 2443 8B29 F6BE http://moleculardevices.org http://nanomachines.net
pgp9Ajhh6BqCE.pgp
Description: PGP signature
