On Fri, Jan 28, 2005 at 10:16:44AM -0500, Tyler Durden wrote: > That's an interesting point. They seem to be "attacking" at precisely the > correct rate to forcibly evolve P2P systems to be completely invulnerable > to such efforts.
Not really. The P2P assm^H^H^H^H architects are reissuing new systems with holes patched reactively. There's no reason for a P2P system designed in 1996 to be water-tight to any threat model of 2010. (Strangely enough, they had IP nazis and lawyers back then, too). > Hum. Perhaps Tim May works for MPAA? Nah... he wasn't THAT bright, was he? I think he was primarily one thing: frustrated. It's hard to see the idiots win, year after year. -- Eugen* Leitl <a href="http://leitl.org";>leitl</a> ______________________________________________________________ ICBM: 48.07078, 11.61144 http://www.leitl.org 8B29F6BE: 099D 78BA 2FD3 B014 B08A 7779 75B0 2443 8B29 F6BE http://moleculardevices.org http://nanomachines.net
pgptka0VZTih7.pgp
Description: PGP signature
