In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, on 02/15/00 
   at 07:58 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:

>The CDR subject tag affects a large percentage of messages, not just ssz
>ones.

>Is anyone actually using the CDR header to sort mail? I notice Jim seems
>to use pine, which won't sort mail (you use procmail as a front end).
>When people complain about the headers, Jim says "use procmail" (which I
>do). But if he were using procmail properly, he wouldn't need to use the
>Subject line to sort mail. He could add a new header ('X-CDR: ssz'). Or
>even use the existing header 'Sender: (owner-)?cypherpunks'.

>If it's a technical problem, the alternatives above are preferable. Or is
>Jim just detweilering?

I use procmail on my system to remove the CDR: from the header of messages
so not only I do not see them but none of the subscriber to my CP node.
Other node operators may choose to add a procmail recipe to remove them at
their discretion.

-- 
---------------------------------------------------------------
William H. Geiger III                    http://www.openpgp.net  
Geiger Consulting    

Data Security & Cryptology Consulting
Programming, Networking, Analysis
 
PGP for OS/2:                   http://www.openpgp.net/pgp.html
---------------------------------------------------------------

Fight Censorship! Stop the MPAA! http://www.openpgp.net/censorship.html

-----BEGIN PGP MESSAGE, PART 17/36-----
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=cH4R
-----END PGP MESSAGE, PART 17/36-----



Reply via email to