[At last people are starting to wake up to the problem as well as some of the 
solutions.]

http://www.thestandard.com/article/article_print/1,1153,16232,00.html

Consumers Fight Back, Anonymously 
New privacy technologies could tip the balance in favor of individual rights. 
By Elinor Abreu 
Over the last few years it's become an accepted truth that as technology advances, 
privacy recedes. E-mail, computer hard drives and Internet surfing trails have become 
rich fields mined by marketers and law enforcement for information individuals 
previously assumed was sacrosanct.

Now, that may be changing. The tables are turning as new technologies emerge that 
return to consumers some of the control over their private information once thought 
lost. Individually, these are narrowly focused products: Some let people surf the Web 
anonymously, others set e-mail messages to vanish after a specified period of time. 
Some offer encryption that until recently was restricted in the United States. Taken 
together, they could herald a fundamental change in the relations between individuals 
and the governments and corporations looking over their shoulders.


How these devices and systems are deployed and regulated in the next few years will 
have a profound effect on the ongoing struggle over privacy rights.


"We're now at a critical point in this debate," says David Sobel, legal counsel for 
the Electronic Privacy Information Center, "and the balance could really go either 
way."


"Going forward, [privacy] will be one of the most important issues this century," says 
Austin Hill , whose company Zero-Knowledge offers anonymous Internet surfing. "The 
next five years will be the deciding factor."


The original online privacy battle was over encryption. Philip Zimmermann, creator of 
PGP, the strongest encryption program available to individuals, was threatened with 
legal action by the federal government for violating export regulations by 
distributing his code over the Web. The case was finally dropped in 1996, and last 
year the Clinton administration relaxed its export policy.


"Crypto is one technology that enhances our privacy," says Zimmermann. "Most 
technology advances are windfalls for law enforcement, but here's one that helped the 
rest of the people."


With the crypto-wars effectively over, a powerful tool that keeps e-mail conversations 
private now rests in the hands of individuals.


But other threats have emerged, intensifying demand for new privacy tools. In the face 
of public outcry, DoubleClick backed off its plan to combine offline and online 
consumer data. The company is under investigation by the Federal Trade Commission and 
is negotiating with attorneys general in four states to forestall or settle 
class-action lawsuits over its use of personal data. The FTC is also investigating 
Amazon.com , eBay and Yahoo for privacy infringements. Yahoo was recently sued for 
revealing customer identities under subpoena, and in a separate lawsuit a Florida 
state judge has ordered Yahoo to reveal the identities of users accused of posting 
defamatory information online.


The FTC is also seeking legislation to enforce privacy protections after finding that 
less than half of the Web's most popular sites were in compliance with fair 
information practice guidelines. And last week, CEOs from a group of companies 
including AT&T , Dell, DoubleClick and Ford announced the formation of a coalition to 
address privacy concerns, hoping to head off attempts at regulation.


Outside the U.S., countries historically dedicated to protecting consumer privacy have 
inched away from that stance. In May, Canada confirmed that it is creating a database 
on its citizens; new legislation introduced in France would require people who publish 
Web pages to register with authorities; and a bill in England would give police more 
power to monitor Internet surfers. The European Union has endorsed a pact that will 
make U.S. businesses, rather than the U.S. government, responsible for protecting 
European citizen data.


Consumers are paying attention. A new survey from Odyssey, a San Francisco-based 
market research firm, shows that 92 percent of American households say they don't 
trust companies to keep their personal information confidential.


Now that U.S. restrictions on encryption have relaxed, an array of new encryption 
tools and companies has appeared, such as 1on1mail, HushMail, Lokmail, PrivacyX and 
ZixMail. Other companies give consumers different strategies: Saratoga, Calif.-based 
IDcide lets people reject all cookies, or bits of identifying code left on a 
computer's hard drive; Ontrack removes cookies, history files and other evidence of 
Web surfing from a surfer's machine; Privada and PrivaSeek let users control the 
information revealed to Web sites; and Anonymizer allows people to anonymously surf 
the Web.


Montreal-based Zero-Knowledge takes anonymous Web surfing a step further � its 
customers can choose to surf the Web anonymously or under a pseudonym. People sign up 
for the service, dubbed "Freedom," under another name for $10 per name per year. For 
example, a surfer might use one identity for financial sites and another for 
entertainment sites. The software acts as a sort of firewall-on-a-PC, managing cookies 
and ensuring that information on the computer doesn't leak out without the owner's 
consent. Traffic is routed through Zero-Knowledge's network and encrypted in multiple 
layers, so it can't be traced in either direction. The company partners with about 180 
Internet service providers and is talking to major backbone providers to enlarge its 
network, says Hill, the 26-year-old founder.


Another promising new technology is vanishing e-mail. San Francisco-based Disappearing 
lets corporations (and soon individuals) wipe out e-mail from hard drives and back up 
storage drives on computers and throughout networks after a set period of time, from 
one hour to years. Disappearing's CEO Maclen Marvit describes his product in First 
Amendment terms.


"If you can't speak privately, you can't collect your thoughts in order to have public 
speech," says Marvit. When it's possible to recover deleted e-mail, "there is 
effectively a microphone over our heads whenever we use e-mail."


Bill Gates , whose e-mail messages came back to haunt him during the Microsoft 
antitrust trial, could have benefited from Disappearing technology. In fact, the 
service arguably could be used to help companies preempt efforts to subpoena 
documents. But corporations have been shredding paper for years, points out 
Disappearing's research director David Marvit, Maclen Marvit's brother.


"There's a lot of precedence about what you're allowed to shred. The same legal case 
law applies," David Marvit explains. "Privacy is a two-edged sword. Anytime you enable 
a civil liberty you help the good guys and you help the bad guys."


What, then, are the consequences of placing powerful privacy tools in the hands of 
individuals? In the future, will we all send e-mail that self-destructs after five 
seconds, and shop in anonymity? Will terrorists exchange nuclear secrets over the 
Internet, without fear of being traced?


Executives with privacy companies acknowledge that masking identities and erasing 
network footprints such as IP addresses could make it harder for law enforcement to 
track down people committing securities fraud, for instance. "Giving out such a system 
which totally encrypts your outgoing traffic, without any safeguards against use by 
malicious users, seems a bit irresponsible," says Ron Perry, president and cofounder 
of IDcide.


Even Phil Zimmermann, a folk hero to privacy advocates, admits that anonymization 
technology poses special challenges. "I'm concerned about the side effects total 
anonymity might have," he says. "But if I had to choose between the terrible loss of 
privacy and what we're seeing on the Web, and the risks from anonymity, I'd much 
rather have extreme anonymity than none."


The Securities and Exchange Commission, which recently came under fire for its 
proposal to permanently monitor stock-market-related message boards for possible 
securities fraud, is taking a wait-and-see approach to the new technologies. "There 
are lots of ways to track people down," says John Reed Stark, chief of the SEC's 
Office of Internet Enforcement. "If those things change, then we'll have to 
reconfigure our approach."


"There are going to be cases in which anonymity will create difficulties for law 
enforcement," says EPIC's Sobel. "But I think the benefits of anonymity for the 
average user and for the online industry far outweigh the potential for abuses."


For advertisers and marketers, the issues surrounding beefed-up privacy are equally 
sticky. Advertisements on the Internet target specific buyers, while many consumer Web 
sites pride themselves on "personalization" � figuring out a customer's buying habits 
and designing Web marketing schemes accordingly.


Rather than hinder e-commerce, however, privacy technology could actually boost it by 
reassuring consumers that their information is guarded. New privacy tools, says Sobel, 
are "certainly good for the development of the Internet because [they] would remove a 
lot of the hesitation that a lot of people have about conducting transactions online."


The next step for privacy companies? Anonymous payment and shipping, an area in which 
Zero-Knowledge and others are making advances. Once people can make online purchases 
without giving out credit card numbers or other identifying information � and can 
hoard their wealth in online "Swiss bank accounts" that can't be tracked to their 
offline persona � e-commerce will enter a new phase.


It's unlikely that in the future everyone will choose total online anonymity. But the 
new privacy technologies have implications that go beyond the short-term questions of 
law enforcement and marketing.


"The real dimension here isn't the choice between privacy and disclosure," says Paul 
Saffo, director of the Institute for the Future in Menlo Park, Calif. "The real story 
is the impact it has on our sense of identity. The fact that we can selectively 
disclose things on the Internet is changing the nature of social interactions. If you 
can change your persona at will in cyberspace, that begins affecting what you think of 
your own identity and who you think you are." 

Reply via email to