Sir Robert Hettinga wrote:
> With supporting e-gold as a currency, or paypal or some other similar,
> it is so obviously a good idea that if they don't do it immediately,
> then they have their reasons to avoid these things. Wanting to do
> money issuance RSN could be one of those reasons.
The last time I looked into e-gold, there was no form of anonymous bailment.
Has this changed? There was even some garbage on e-gold's web site along the
lines of "we won't be a party to money-laundering schemes" and "pay Caesar all
he asks with his money, and use e-gold for everything else."
I'd rather not deal with Caesar at all.
--PH
_____________________________________________
Get Your Free Email from http://www.hotml.com
