Peter,

A few citations relating to Friedman's right to recover damages for patent 
infringement.


With respect to recovering damages from the USG (from 35 USC 183):

<Quote>
Sec. 183. Right to compensation

An applicant, his successors, assigns, or legal representatives, whose 
patent is withheld as herein provided [i.e. whenever publication or 
disclosure might be detrimental to the national security, as described in 
Section 181], shall have the right, beginning at the date the applicant is 
notified that, except for such order, his application is otherwise in 
condition for allowance, or February 1, 1952, whichever is later, and ending 
six years after a patent is issued thereon, to apply to the head of any 
department or agency who caused the order to be issued for compensation for 
the damage caused by the order of secrecy and/or for the use of the 
invention by the Government, resulting from his disclosure.
...
</Quote>


And from 35 USC 286 (w.r.t recovery of damages against private sector 
infringers):
<Quote>
Sec. 286. Time limitation on damages

Except as otherwise provided by law, no recovery shall be had for any 
infringement committed more than six years prior to the filing of
the complaint or counterclaim for infringement in the action.
...
</Quote>



Finally from 35 USC 287:
<Quote>
Sec. 287. Limitation on damages and other remedies; marking and notice

     (a) [Patent holder's responsibility to "mark" items manufactured  using 
the patented invention] ... In the event of failure so to mark, no damages 
shall be recovered by the patentee in any action for infringement, except on 
proof that the infringer was notified of the infringement and continued to 
infringe thereafter, in which event damages may be recovered only for 
infringement occurring after such notice. Filing of an action for 
infringement shall constitute such notice.
...
</Quote>


IANAL, BTW.

Based on the above though, I doubt Friedman (or his estate) have much chance 
of collecting from private sector individuals.  The US government is a 
different matter.

Also, current patents are granted for a period of 20 years from the time of 
application (which, in this case, was obviously passed long before any 
significant private sector infringement might have occurred).  It used to be 
17 years from the time of patent grant though, wasn't it?  If so, I don't 
know what rule would have been applied to patents already pending when the 
rules were changed.


- GH
________________________________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com

Reply via email to