you can still do private name.space and be global all at the same time.
Joe Baptista
http://www.dot.god/
dot.GOD Hostmaster
+1 (805) 753-8697
On Sun, 13 Aug 2000, Anonymous wrote:
> > There's no point in using a neighborhood name space that's
> > not available globally for a resource that _is_ connected globally -
>
> /ad hominem on
> This is the clear case of globalistic poisonong.
> /ad hominem off
>
> "whatever is on the net must be global".
>
> Bullshit. I could not care less about the one-sells-shit-to-many
> or so-called "e-commerce" or even "web" model.
>
> The 'net is not just the "www".
>
> I think that we should start to use the 'net as uucp used telephone
> network. Send bits over whatever suits private and secure communication
> needs. "They" can not shut down the "web" because too many biggies
> depend on it for milking the sheeple.
>
> Think about it. Setting up uucp link in 80-ties was much more complicated
> than inventing new protocol today and implementing it today over IP network.
>
> Or did we just became too lazy and stick to using what is now
> definetely "their" network ?
>
> Their fear is peer to peer (SM)
>
>
