Yeah, but there's always the old "sources and methods" excuse
(based on personal experience). Seems to require many more
lawyer cycles than I can afford...
Regards,
Rich
-----Original Message-----
From: Duncan Frissell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thursday, August 31, 2000 4:22 PM
Subject: Princess Di, Echelon, & the Trial Lawyers
>
>So Dodi's dad and Princess Di's once future father in law Mohamed Fayed is
>suing the Feds for intelligence intercepts related to the British plot to
>kill the Princess to keep her from marrying outside of her race.
>
>http://washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A50145-2000Aug30.html
>
>Lawsuit Seeks Secret Files In Death of Princess Diana
>
>What all the coverage ignored was the Echelon link. Mohamed is really
>asking for the Echelon intercepts on Di.
>
>If the White Commonwealth plus the US are going to set up a worldwide spy
>system so they can trade intercepts on their own subjects and tap the Wogs
>to boot, then they are going to end up (in theory) knowing everything about
>everything including MI6 plots to off Di. Beyond this they will also know
>everything about Presidential coupling, and all the nefarious plans of Big
>Tobacco, and the Drug Companies' pricing strategies and everything else.
>
>If those records exist, then they can, in theory, be subpoenaed. And it's
>only a matter of time before the trial bar calls in its markers from the
>Demon-Cat Party and gets access. Won't that be fun. Broad civil
>discovery, indeed.
>
>DCF
>----
>Johnny had four truckloads of plutonium.
>Johnny used four truckloads of plutonium to light New York City for a year.
>Then how many truckloads of plutonium did Johnny have?
>Six!
> -- Breeder reactor ad from the glory days of nuclear power at the Edison
>Electric Institute.
>
