-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, Oct 17, 2000 at 10:20:23PM -0700, petro wrote:
> >Hash: SHA1
> >
> >On Tue, Oct 17, 2000 at 06:48:48PM -0700, Tim May wrote:
> >> >
> >> > >On Mon, 16 Oct 2000, [iso-8859-1] Ing. Fausto C.G. wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >>> I dont now where did you get my e-mail, but I am
> >> >>> receiving spam from you. Stop it right now, please, I
> >> >>> didnt ask you for your spam. This time I am asking it
> >> > >> kindly, next time I wont ask it this way.
> >>
> >> Do your best, you fucking twit.
> >>
> >> People like you who threaten us need to be taken out and shot.
> >>
> >> We are adding you to the special "high spam diet."
> >>
> >> Hope you like it, jerk.
> >>
> >>
> >
> >Come on, lighten up. The guy's receiving spam, and like most people,
> >he gets pissed about it. So he sends a nasty email to the address in
> >the From: line of the spams. Can you blame him?
>
> He's not getting spam. He's been subscribed to the
> cypherpunks list by someone.
>
OK. Still, he's getting unwanted email, and it's not his fault (I assume).
> And yes, I can blame him for being clueless.
Clueless how? Because he hadn't heard of the cypherpunks list? Or is
there some other reason he's clueless?
- --
Nathan Saper ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) | http://www.well.com/user/natedog/
GnuPG (ElGamal/DSA): 0x9AD0F382 | PGP 2.x (RSA): 0x386C4B91
Standard PGP & PGP/MIME OK | AOL Instant Messenger: linuxfu
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.4 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org
iD8DBQE57kaN2FWyBZrQ84IRAhScAKC/Dtx0+PmBHqet683PL1rjulpPJwCgtjAc
jvanZ8YDImxw5PDks78RFNU=
=R624
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
