At 09:04 10/30/2000 -0600, Carskadden, Rush wrote:
>where he actually says this himself). Under no circumstances do I consider
>it wise to fly in the face of checks and balances when your cause is
>"right" but you do not have the majority power. There is a reason that
>Congress makes laws, just as there is a reason that the Presidents can
>veto, as there is a reason that the Judicial system interprets the law.
>It's designed to create a balance that protects us from a loose cannon
>government going off and acting recklessly.
Ah, but they already have. Your beloved "checks and balances" don't work.
-Declan
