On Wed, Sep 4, 2013 at 11:25 AM, Kyle Maxwell <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 4, 2013 at 9:33 AM, Lodewijk andré de la porte <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > Additional tricks such as delayed further transmission, network path > mixing, > > etc. are all possible with what I have in my paper and should be (easily) > > doable in Tor. > > > > I never really understood the problem with traffic analysis. > > Trickle connections are an interesting idea and will work for some > applications where high latency and possibly low throughput are okay. > I look forward to reading that paper. > > Though re: traffic analysis, if your traffic stands out too much (i.e. > for relatively low n on a global scale), then you'll still have > issues[0]. And the devil's in the details, as Tom Ritter's fine work > around AAM[1] has shown. > > [0]: Obligatory XKCD: http://xkcd.com/1105/ > [1]: http://ritter.vg/blog-deanonymizing_amm.html > > -- > @kylemaxwell > > Lest we forget: WASTE had 'chaff' communication capabilities. The problem is that bandwidth isn't free; also standing out ;) -- Twitter <https://twitter.com/tbiehn> | LinkedIn<http://www.linkedin.com/in/travisbiehn>| GitHub <http://github.com/tbiehn> | TravisBiehn.com<http://www.travisbiehn.com>
