On 9/27/13, Eugen Leitl <[email protected]> wrote: > On Fri, Sep 27, 2013 at 01:12:19PM -0400, grarpamp wrote: >> >> The mentioned tech has nothing to do with traditional 'ham'. >> And without the crypto key they can't see it and can't disrupt > > HamNet/AMPRNet ... > Of course they can see it, it's a TCP/IP network routed
Again, I'm not talking about encrypting packets and stuffing them over some simple carrier centered at n-MHz. That's old tech, and possibly dangerous to the well being of users noted in the OP before me.
