Al-qaeda.net still works. May want to use ALQ comsec for
surefire inescapable gravity of the galaxy's ravenous spy
black dwarves. Ref: Inspire magazine 2010:

http://cryptome.org/2013/09/al-qaeda-comsec.htm

> At first I frowned and wondered why. Then I thought it was likely a
> joke and if it wasn't then what's the problem with al-qaeda? Also a
> distinct lack of right-to-left garbage spewing at me.

(to clarify, this list used to have the address [email protected],
until liberals afraid of their own shadow forced it into more neutral
territory. Many people joined at that point, somewhat diluting the
existing radicalism.)

> Of course putting things into the people's hands (truly and
> irrevocably) is something that's very cypherpunk. In that sense it's
> also very anarchist, as permission from anyone is not required to take
> that power.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cryptoanarchism

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cypherpunk

This isn't a hard concept to grasp.

--
Sent from Ubuntu



Reply via email to