On 2.10.2013 21:23, Jim Bell wrote: > What if, for example, the Feds were no longer able to prosecute > 70,000 people per year (the current figure, approximately), but > instead were limited to, say, 5,000 per year? > Jim Bell > > > Jim, this argument does not work and it is really dangerous because : - if there is some totalistic system/strong law enforcing, than atmosphere of terror could destroy whatever people try during time - there where already "electronic terrorism" raids and prosecutions in cases like 4chan/anonymous when LOIC was used - a lot of people just joined DDoSing of some servers and they where thinking "we are many, no problem" and it was
So I find this argument serously dangerous, because "System" is just gristmill and relatively a lot of time, to finish its job. Basically LAW against BC should not be approved by society. ~ Over -- “Borders I have never seen one. But I have heard they exist in the minds of some people.” ― Thor Heyerdahl www...................http://overdrive.a-nihil.net twitter...............https://twitter.com/#!/idoru23 GoogleTalk/[email protected] last.fm...............http://www.last.fm/user/overdrive23 GnuPG public key......http://overdrive.a-nihil.net/overdrive.txt GnuPG key FingerPrint.072C C0AD 88EF F681 5E52 5329 8483 4860 6E19 949D
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
