because having certitude that everyone is respecting everyone else's personal, blog-able, feelings is the cornerstone of any self-respecting “punk” movement.
On Oct 29, 2013, at 3:55 PM, Tarzie X <[email protected]> wrote: > As a newcomer to the list, I'm not crazy about the personalization going on > here, either, but let's not take sides. I'm not crazy about having had an > excerpt of my blog post cherry-picked and mischaracterized for the sake of > settling some score in some conflict that doesn't even involve me. > > If you guys can't keep it offline -- surely everyone's preference, right? -- > at least leave other people, and their blog posts, out of it, k? > > > > > > On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 2:59 PM, Steve Furlong <[email protected]> wrote: > On Mon, Oct 28, 2013 at 7:28 PM, coderman <[email protected]> wrote: > (who is a jerk for speaking ill of Jacob, i do admit!) > > Without getting to the personalities or facts of this case, concerning which > I know nothing, I object to this statement at bottom of coderman's message. > > If people are dumbasses or liars and you don't call them on it, they'll not > only continue to be dumbasses or liars (which is their own business) but > they'll continue to inflict themselves on other people. These innocent > bystanders might not have any warning about the nature of the dumbass or liar > and might thereby be harmed by them. > > As a fine, upstanding member of civil society, it is your *duty* to publicly > call dumbasses dumbasses and liars liars. It's for the benefit of us all. > Thank you in advance. > > Or, you know, just kill them all. As per my tagline. > > -- > Neca eos omnes. Deus suos agnoscet. -- Arnaud-Amaury, 1209 >
