---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: coderman <[email protected]> Date: Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 12:06 AM Subject: Re: [zs-p2p] [Cryptography] Fwd: [IP] 'We cannot trust' Intel and Via's chip-based crypto, FreeBSD developers say To: [email protected]
On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 3:57 PM, Bill Cox <[email protected]> wrote: > ... > So, I'm going to modify it a bit to use the resistors available on my chip > and reduce the caps, fix the supply sensitivity, and I think I can run 16 of > these things in parallel at 100-200MHz on the tiny .35u CMOS chip I'm > designing. I'll spit out the raw waveforms from the inverters, buffered > once, through 16 "analog" pins, so there wont be any fear (hopefully) that > I'm cooking the data on-chip, before you can see it, and I'll open-source > the schematics. If there's a circuit that can consume all 1.6Gbit/sec of > this raw data, have fun with it! raw samples at 1.6Gb/s would be useful infrequently[0]; raw samples from a trusted device extremely useful at any bitrate! what is "my chip" and how can we find out more / support your efforts? best regards, 0. to date i have only maxed out 400Mb/s raw VIA Padlock sources for SSD FDE initialization and constructed experiments in temporal key rolling. it is however common to regularly consume on the order of 10Mb/s on a busy server, generating many keys, using crypto happy software, etc. (this is why every processor, every embedded device should have a physical entropy source, with access to raw samples. still waiting...)
