--On Friday, December 13, 2013 7:31 PM -0800 Tom Ritter <t...@ritter.vg>
wrote:
> I doubt it - abuse through Tor is a legitimate problem.
Not sure what that means. At any rate, there seems to be something wrong
with the bitcoin forum blocking anonymous(sort-of) access, no?
> Wikipedia blocks
> editing from Tor for the same reason.
ah, wikipedia....
>
> There are ideas for solving this though, and it would be cool to see more
> ideas, and more fleshing out of them. Mike Hearn has talked about having
> people make a bitcoin deposit for an account, and after so much time of
> legitimate use, the deposit is refunded.
Legitimate use? Such as? Parroting whatever garbge the 'wikipedia
editors'
say it must be parroted?
> Before that, if it's used for
> abuse, the deposit is kept by the service.
That's cool. So, say something those idiots don't like, and they 'keep'
(steal) your money.
>
> -tom
>
