On 2013-12-16 17:42, grarpamp wrote:
So if you are communicating with one of these new fangled email addresses,
you have to have the software that encrypts, and your message is secure -
because you are not using the old email protocol, though there may something
on your computer that pretends to use old email protocol for the benefit of
your client.
I read most of your posts here. But is this a question? A statement?
Please break into parts and rephrase.
It is my understanding of the proposed replacement for email. Magic
email addresses that in fact correspond to an identifier of a public
key, for example the hash of a rule that identifies the public key, and
which result in your message not in fact being passed along by email
protocols.
