A good point, Jake. That status quo of commercial journalism.
What's better than advocacy journalism subservience? How about an unfettered unredacted disclosure for unlimited access free of censorious redaction and withholding? And giving up the "dump" red herring, WikiLeaks is unfairly accused of that, and has been considerably more various, experimental and risk-taking than professional journalism. It would do well to give up the privileged protection of journalism which demeans its reputation. Exceptions to the cowardice of journalism abound, but have to be found so little are they known and credited beyond naming awards, and they defy the presumed status quo of what is permissable lawful and craven. Yes, many went to jail rather than bray about the jailing of others, reaping the rewards of consulting with authorities to maintain access. Hoped you had nutted Stew Baker, a lying sack of shit. At 01:07 PM 12/17/2013, you wrote:
[email protected]: > all > journalism is now advocacy journalism; All journalism is and has always been "advocacy" journalism. Often people don't notice the so-called advocacy as it is usually for the unjust status quo in an unquestioning, fully compromising subservient manner, I'd add. All the best, Jacob
