Thanks that is very interesting I will pass the knowledge to others I know

From what I understand Aaron was profoundly unhinged by the fact that he would 
have to live his life as a convicted felon and that was his major issue 

Pure sadness ...

Sent from my iPhoney

On 01.01.2014, at 21:28, Jim Bell <[email protected]> wrote:

> No, I'm sorry, I have no links with other MIT alums.
> 
> One big misunderstanding that would have been able to clear up with aaron 
> swartz had I been aware of his situation, that I hope other readers will now 
> learn, is the issue of how much time he (or other federal defendants) would 
> have faced if convicted.  Federal criminal laws generally include with them a 
> statement of the maximum punishment that can be applied:  They are generally 
> even numbers, such as "5 years", "10 years", "15 years" or so.  However, such 
> statements are basically archaic:  In 1987, the laws were changed (prisoners 
> called it "new law") to calculate sentences based on the defendant's criminal 
> history, the severity of the crime, and other facts.   See   
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_Federal_Sentencing_Guidelines      
> 
> The following sentencing table is part of that Wikipedia article.  I assume 
> that Aaron Swartz would have had a "zero" "criminal history", in other words 
> the Column labelled "I" (0 or 1) would have been used.  An offense level up 
> to 8 would have specified a sentence between 0 and 6 months.   I would have 
> to look up the specific charges to see what he faced, but I strongly doubt 
> that he would have been sentenced to over 2 years, and probably under 1 year. 
>  
>        Jim Bell
> 
> ================quote from Wikipedia begins================
> 
> Sentencing table
> The sentencing table is an integral part of the U.S. Sentencing 
> Guidelines.[24]
> The Offense Level (1-43) forms the vertical axis of the Sentencing Table. The 
> Criminal History Category (I-VI) forms the horizontal axis of the Table. The 
> intersection of the Offense Level and Criminal History Category displays the 
> Guideline Range in months of imprisonment. "Life" means life imprisonment. 
> For example, the guideline range applicable to a defendant with an Offense 
> Level of 15 and a Criminal History Category of III is 24–30 months of 
> imprisonment.
> Sentencing Table (effective Nov. 2012)
> (showing months of imprisonment)[25][26]
> Offense  Level ↓      Criminal History Category
> (Criminal History Points)
> I
> (0 or 1)      II
> (2 or 3)      III
> (4,5,6)       IV
> (7,8,9)       V
> (10,11,12)    VI
> (13+)
> Zone A        1       0-6     0-6     0-6     0-6     0-6     0-6
> 2     0-6     0-6     0-6     0-6     0-6     1-7
> 3     0-6     0-6     0-6     0-6     2-8     3-9
> 4     0-6     0-6     0-6     2-8     4-10    6-12
> 5     0-6     0-6     1-7     4-10    6-12    9-15
> 6     0-6     1-7     2-8     6-12    9-15    12-18
> 7     0-6     2-8     4-10    8-14    12-18   15-21
> 8     0-6     4-10    6-12    10-16   15-21   18-24
> Zone B        9       4-10    6-12    8-14    12-18   18-24   21-27
> 10    6-12    8-14    10-16   15-21   21-27   24-30
> 11    8-14    10-16   12-18   18-24   24-30   27-33
> Zone C        12      10-16   12-18   15-21   21-27   27-33   30-37
> 13    12-18   15-21   18-24   24-30   30-37   33-41
> Zone D        14      15-21   18-24   21-27   27-33   33-41   37-46
> 15    18-24   21-27   24-30   30-37   37-46   41-51
> 16    21-27   24-30   27-33   33-41   41-51   46-57
> 17    24-30   27-33   30-37   37-46   46-57   51-63
> 18    27-33   30-37   33-41   41-51   51-63   57-71
> 19    30-37   33-41   37-46   46-57   57-71   63-78
> 20    33-41   37-46   41-51   51-63   63-78   70-87
> 21    37-46   41-51   46-57   57-71   70-87   77-96
> 22    41-51   46-57   51-63   63-78   77-96   84-105
> 23    46-57   51-63   57-71   70-87   84-105  92-115
> 24    51-63   57-71   63-78   77-96   92-115  100-125
> 25    57-71   63-78   70-87   84-105  100-125 110-137
> 26    63-78   70-87   78-97   92-115  110-137 120-150
> 27    70-87   78-97   87-108  100-125 120-150 130-162
> 28    78-97   87-108  97-121  110-137 130-162 140-175
> 29    87-108  97-121  108-135 121-151 140-175 151-188
> 30    97-121  108-135 121-151 135-168 151-188 168-210
> 31    108-135 121-151 135-168 151-188 168-210 188-235
> 32    121-151 135-168 151-188 168-210 188-235 210-262
> 33    135-168 151-188 168-210 188-235 210-262 235-293
> 34    151-188 168-210 188-235 210-262 235-293 262-327
> 35    168-210 188-235 210-262 235-293 262-327 292-365
> 36    188-235 210-262 235-293 262-327 292-365 324-405
> 37    210-262 235-293 262-327 292-365 324-405 360-life
> 38    235-293 262-327 292-365 324-405 360-life        360-life
> 39    262-327 292-365 324-405 360-life        360-life        360-life
> 40    292-365 324-405 360-life        360-life        360-life        360-life
> 41    324-405 360-life        360-life        360-life        360-life        
> 360-life
> 42    360-life        360-life        360-life        360-life        
> 360-life        360-life
> 43    life    life    life    life    life    life
> 
>   
> From: Cari Machet <[email protected]>
> To: Jim Bell <[email protected]> 
> Cc: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>; "[email protected]" 
> <[email protected]> 
> Sent: Wednesday, January 1, 2014 1:04 AM
> Subject: Re: Jacob Appelbaum in Germany
> 
> I sincerely wish you could have helped aaron it is all beyond sad and though 
> some of his projects are being carried out i think we have to do more - Yes I 
> am aware you are an alumni - do u have connections with other alumni ? We 
> think the alumni are a pressure point they cld not ignore 
> 
> Will connect with you further as the project progresses 
> 
> Thanks very very much 
> 
> Sent from my iPhone
> 
> On 31.12.2013, at 20:59, Jim Bell <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
>> I am an alum of MIT (Class of 1980; Chemistry).  I've just read the 
>> Wikipedia article on Aaron Swartz, and I am very sympathetic to him.   I 
>> wish I'd been aware of his situation while he was alive; I might have been 
>> able to help, and would have tried to do so.
>>           Jim Bell
>> 
>> 
>> From: Cari Machet <[email protected]>
>> To: Silent1 <[email protected]> 
>> Cc: cpunks <[email protected]> 
>> Sent: Tuesday, December 31, 2013 8:03 AM
>> Subject: Re: Jacob Appelbaum in Germany
>> 
>> dear sir
>> 
>> we are reaching out to MIT alumni to make a public call of outrage re
>> among other things the aaron swartz treatment by MIT would u b willing
>> to b included?
>> 
>> specifically we would b asking for shifts in functionality not just
>> complaining to the bricks
>> 
>> THANKS
>> 
>> On 12/31/13, Silent1 <[email protected]> wrote:
>> > Ahh, Dogecoin, didn't an online wallet service of theirs get hacked last
>> > week and completely cleaned out of hundreds of thousands of coins?
>> >
>> > -----Original Message-----
>> > From: cypherpunks [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of
>> > coderman
>> > Sent: Tuesday, December 31, 2013 8:51 AM
>> > To: Griffin Boyce
>> > Cc: cpunks
>> > Subject: Re: Jacob Appelbaum in Germany
>> >
>> > On Tue, Dec 31, 2013 at 12:32 AM, Griffin Boyce <[email protected]>
>> > wrote:
>> >>...
>> >>  I prefer my shared hallucinations to be in the form of Lindens [1], ...
>> >
>> >
>> > i'll let you cypherpunks in on a secret financial tip:
>> >  the smart money banks in dogecoin: http://dogecoin.com/
>> 
>> >
>> >
>> 
>> 
>> -- 
>> Cari Machet
>> NYC 646-436-7795
>> [email protected]
>> AIM carismachet
>> Skype carimachet - 646-652-6434
>> Syria +963-099 277 3243
>> Amman +962 077 636 9407
>> Berlin +49 152 11779219
>> Twitter: @carimachet <https://twitter.com/carimachet>
>> 
>> Ruh-roh, this is now necessary: This email is intended only for the
>> addressee(s) and may contain confidential information. If you are not the
>> intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any use of this
>> information, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this email without
>> permission is strictly prohibited.
>> 
>> 
>> 
> 
> 

Reply via email to