--On Wednesday, January 08, 2014 4:14 PM +1000 "James A. Donald" <[email protected]> wrote:
> "James A. Donald" >> > No one gave a damn about Aaron Swartz leaking the docs. That was not >> > what he was charged with, and not what pissed off the sysadmins. What >> > pissed off the sysadmins was physical intrusion, and him bringing the >> > network to its knees. > > On 2014-01-08 11:32, Juan Garofalo wrote: >> That is bullshit. > > That is the charges against Aaron Swartz. > http://docs.jstor.org/summary.html That's a link to jstor. Irrelevant. > >> If you want to attack Swartz you can do it without laughably trying to >> defend the 'physical property' of the mit mafia. Your defense being >> doubly weird since you're supposedly a libertarian? > > Libertarians are propertarians. Only when 'private property' is subordinated to FREEDOM. > > Property rights are the boundaries between one man's plan and another > man's plan. If the ruling elite casually violate property rights, then, > as with Obamacare, the result is chaos, You're just a right winger, not a libertarian. Right wingers are always babbling about how bad democrats are while commiting the same crimes. > which must be resolved by one > plan imposed on all to restore order in order to avoid collapse. Terror > follows in due course. Should the terror ease, collapse follows. > > This has been explained by Mises and Hayek, fucking conservative statists - and lapdogs of anglo-american fascism. > and colorfully dramatized by > Ayn Rand. fucking americunt fascist. > > >
