1) Thank you for making me laugh, I enjoyed reading that. You should write books..
2) OTP, One True Pairing! also Oulun Työväen Palloilijat. :-) :-) 3) On a slightly divergent note, yes to more decentralization / free and open source stuff everywhere. More transparency, good. OK, enough buzzwords thrown about. :-) Cheers > Recently it was learned that code, crypto code at least, had become > superfluous. Nothing like that protects anything, and never did. It > has joined alchemy, phrenology, snake religion and astrology as > a pseudo-science for TED rituals and RSA suspicion-fest, > still beloved by the faithful, practiced by charlatans, funded > unstoppably by DoD research and to fill a vast repository of > "unbroken messages" out in Utah, a scholarly debunking topic of > historical recollections of aged cryptographers and classified > conferences at NSA and GCHQ to keep up appearances > of once unbeatable prowess. Fort Meade being converted > to a hospice for the greatest collection of mathematicians. > > Decrypting computers are silently humming with nothing to > crack, blowing through Megawatts of power to protect the jobs > of hundreds of sysadmins and, yes, dumbfoundedly useless > coders surfing for android bestiality. > > Quantum computing collapsed with a whisper, never fulfilling > its promise to render cryptography useless, beaten by a guy > named Snowden or something who revealed that the crypto > leader of the universe had arranged the end of trustworthy > crypto code by rigging holes and backdoors and tricks and > planting malware in every conceivable piece of machinery > everywhere all the time. > > Now everything electromagnetic is romantic daydreaming > of what never was. > > Remaining, for a while longer, is a 3x5 OTP and a pencil. For > sending coded love notes up your MTM ass. Like here. > > > At 04:43 PM 1/18/2014, you wrote: > >>to the inmates: >> its seems we have a number of the intellectually lazy among us >> who either dont/wont >>or in some way refuse to code.. yet they wish to call themselves >>cypherpunks and hackers. >> >> >> >> am I missing something here about these wannabe(s) > > >
