--On Thursday, March 06, 2014 10:01 AM -0500 John Young <[email protected]> wrote:
> http://mag.newsweek.com/2014/03/14/bitcoin-satoshi-nakamoto.html > You guys think the story is to be believed? <--- I know it's a stupid/rhetorical question, but I couldn't help it =P > > Leah McGrath Goodman > > > @truth_eater > > What a piece of shit reporting. Journalists compulsively play > pop psychologist is reporting on targets to obscure their > lack of technical capability. When ridiculed for this they > say readers want the gossip because they too lack technical > comprehension. > > Not a single journalist resists the temptation for slimey personal > analysis to boost sales from Obama to Putin to Satoshi, from > NY Times to Guardian to WaPo to Wired to The Intercept. > > Still the tech firms suck up to the ignorant outlets for lurid > coverage, crypto firms now leading the pack to promote > comsec panic for digital cash-in. You, once honorably corrupt, > dear cpunks, should be raking it in as if in compelled to > rationalize cryptoligarchy. > > Fuck them dead, the whipsawing comsec windfall bandits. > > > > > At 09:05 AM 3/6/2014, you wrote: >> I *told* you I wasn't Satoshi. >> >> ;-) >> >> Poor bastard... >> >> Cheers, >> RAH >> >> >
