On Thu, Mar 06, 2014 at 04:10:19PM -0800, jim bell wrote: > From: Robert Hettinga <[email protected]> > To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> > > On Mar 6, 2014, at 1:29 PM, jim bell <[email protected]> wrote: > > >> I *told* you I wasn't Sanjuro. > > >But, the *do* want to offer *bounties* on anyone who harms Satoshi, so > >they’ve got *that* goin’ for ‘em. > >:-) > >Cheers, > >RAH > > Clearly, this points to the need to expand the AP/AM implementations to > include 'indefinite targets': AP targets whose names aren't known at the time > the donation is made. And, even targets who really don't even exist at the > time the donation is made. Presumably, Satoshi is still alive and well, thus > nobody out there (yet) has harmed him. Somebody might want to put money > (BTC) on anyone who would do so. > I alluded to this at the time I wrote the AP essay, with my reference to > using AP to attack car thieves. > Jim Bell
I think you just made Satoshi Nakamoto the most well protected person in history. Well played psy-ops my friend. That's almost as good as the hypothetical game big (insert your boogeyman here) might be playing with Putin to make him think Bitcoin is a NSA/CIA operation to ruin the ruble. I'd rather be a Satoshi than a Vladimir right now. -- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Troy Benjegerdes 'da hozer' [email protected] 7 elements earth::water::air::fire::mind::spirit::soul grid.coop Never pick a fight with someone who buys ink by the barrel, nor try buy a hacker who makes money by the megahash
