Dnia środa, 19 marca 2014 20:36:40 grarpamp pisze: > > In connection with using "encrypted, secure connection" Skype for > > Snowden's imagery at SXSW and TED, as well as encrypted comms > > with journalists and event organizers, what has led these comsec > > advisors to believe that all too vulnerable Skype is secure, as well > > as all too vulnerable popular crypto pushed for journalists? > > > > Is there any indication Snowden has deployed less vulnerable > > protections which have not been disclosed as backing for his > > encouragement to trust encryption and to allow Skype to > > finger his location and leak his comms? > > If this was a live conference stream with media types, direct Skype > may have been used since: > - Training a bunch of idiots to use something secure is a pain. > Perhaps traded off with a disposable location and/or that Snowden > is now diplomatically safe in Russia. > - Tor's network characteristics are usually ok for some voice, > but insufficient for live media video. > > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Skype > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Skype_protocol > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Skype_security > http://ashkansoltani.org/?s=skype > > That said, Skype is closed source, carries no future guarantees, > and has a controversial track record... therefore it should not be > trusted under any circumstances. Far better options exist for > approaching your private comms needs... > https://www.prism-break.org/
I am waiting and giddy for a moment when RetroShare implements video. THey did a pretty good job with VoIP: http://rys.io/en/129 -- Pozdr rysiek
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
