The major flaw that I see with this case (and others like it) is that it 
presumes that the defendants actually BELIEVED the statements by the police, 
and RELIED ON them.  From the article:

"Still, undercover officers with the U.S. Secret Service and Miami Beach police 
told both clearly that they wanted to buy bitcoins with cash supposedly 
generated by the hacking of Target Corp. customer information. The undercover 
officers said during the secretly videotaped meetings that they planned to use 
the bitcoins to acquire still more stolen credit cards."


I could 'clearly tell' somebody that the Sun orbited the Earth, but that 
doesn't mean that the statement was factual.  Similarly, the fact that the 
police told these guys what the article claims they did, doesn't require that 
the defendants actually BELIEVED the allegations.  My expectation is that these 
charges will be quietly dropped:  The only ones actually committing the 
crime(s) are the police themselves:  The police solicited money laundering, 
when there were no facts (actual underlying crimes) supporting the money 
laundering predicate.
       Jim Bell




=======================================
http://news.yahoo.com/fla-bitcoin-case-tests-money-laundering-limits-152957544.html



MIAMI BEACH, Fla. (AP) — Two police officers burst through a hotel room door 
with guns drawn, yelling "Police! Get Down!" just after an alleged money 
laundering transaction went down. But instead of briefcases stuffed with a drug 
dealer's cash, this exchange involved an undercover officer with supposedly 
stolen credit cards and the virtual currency bitcoin.
The February arrests of Pascal Reid and Michell Espinoza marked the first time 
any state has brought money laundering charges involving bitcoins, according to 
Miami-Dade State Attorney Katherine Fernandez Rundle. And it's likely to be a 
closely-watched test of whether criminal law can adapt to new digital forms of 
payment.
"These cybercriminals are way ahead of the rest of us in terms of trying to 
figure out ways they can launder dirty money," Rundle said.
Investigators trolled through an online directory of bitcoin traders to find 
the 29-year-old Reid and 30-year-old Espinoza, setting up separate meetings 
with each of the men at restaurants and coffee shops. They were arrested at the 
same Miami Beach hotel on the same day, at different times.
Defense attorneys said the men have no previous criminal records and were 
simply enthusiasts of the payment format that allows people to convert cash 
into digital money for online transactions.
Still, undercover officers with the U.S. Secret Service and Miami Beach police 
told both clearly that they wanted to buy bitcoins with cash supposedly 
generated by the hacking of Target Corp. customer information. The undercover 
officers said during the secretly videotaped meetings that they planned to use 
the bitcoins to acquire still more stolen credit cards.

"My client has never dealt in the area of stolen credit cards," said Espinoza's 
attorney, Rene Palomino Jr. "My client was simply selling a piece of personal 
property, which is what a bitcoin is. It has not been recognized as currency 
yet in the United States."Attorneys for Reid and Espinoza, both of whom have 
pleaded not guilty, say they will challenge the very legal foundations of the 
cases, which are being prosecuted separately. The arrest affidavits for both 
Reid and Espinoza refer to bitcoins as "electronic currency with no central 
authority."
The Internal Revenue Service issued guidance last month concluding that 
bitcoins can only be taxed as property and are not legal tender. Federal law 
enforcement agencies are watching whether bitcoins are used increasingly in 
criminal activity, such as the now-defunct Silk Road illegal drug marketplace.
"The idea that illicit actors might exploit the vulnerabilities of virtual 
currency to launder money is not merely theoretical," said Jennifer Shasky 
Calvery, director of Treasury's Financial Crimes Enforcement Network, in a 
recent Florida speech to bankers.
Still, bitcoins have been gaining popularity among mainstream businesses. 
Overstock.com recently became the first major retailer to accept digital money 
and the NBA's Sacramento Kings in January announced the team would accept 
bitcoins, another first. They are increasingly used in restaurants, coffee 
shops and elsewhere.

The Latin House Grill in Coral Gables is one of the first South Florida 
restaurants to accept bitcoins and has been hosting meetings to educate 
people.Bitcoin users exchange cash for digital money using online exchanges, 
then store it in a computer program that serves as a wallet. The program can 
transfer payments directly to merchants or individuals around the world, 
eliminating transaction fees and the need for bank or credit card information.
"This technology can't go away. It's completely disrupted a lot of existing 
technology that's archaic, that hasn't evolved," said patron Andrew Barnard, 
who has been using bitcoins for a year.
In the Florida criminal case, Reid and Espinoza each face up to 25 years in 
prison if convicted of money laundering and engaging in an unlicensed money 
services business. Reid is free on $100,000 bail but Espinoza has been unable 
so far to make bail.
The transactions started small — one payment of $500 translated into about half 
a bitcoin — and eventually built to a proposed swap involving $30,000 in Reid's 
case.
"Ice cold money. Ice cold cash. Right out of the freezer," the undercover 
agent, holding a plastic bag of cash tells Reid on the surveillance tape. Just 
after Reid accepts the bag, the undercover agent says, "We're cooking with 
gas," an apparent signal to the officers outside to come in.
"You're a cop?" Reid is heard saying on the tape. "You're a cop?"
Reid attorney Ron Lowy said the prosecution was manufactured.
"The government is frightened of bitcoin. Apparently, they see it as an 
emerging, new type of economic medium of exchange, and they're worried that 
they're not regulating it close enough," Lowy said. "These facts do not 
constitute a crime."
___

Reply via email to