From:jim bell <[email protected]> From:Lodewijk andré de la porte <[email protected]>
2014-04-15 21:11 GMT+02:00 Cypher <[email protected]>: This is why I've long been an advocate of total disclosure. I think >the document holders should publish everything they have. After they >do that, they could continue to 'leak release' documents with detailed >explanations for those who are too lazy or too confused by the >documents to sift through them and read them but having a document >dump out there would make the process of disclosure /much/ faster. >The problem is that the general public is very slow to learn. Every step along >the way even the wise said things >like "OH! The NSA said A, but they'll never >say B!". Then two weeks later the docs show that B has not just >been said, >it'd been SCREAMED. Then the word is "But they'll never say C!". Etc. Maybe at >some point >people will pick it up differently. >It also fits the media format better to drip info. A new news article every >new drip. That makes for a lot more >exposure. If they are going to 'drip, drip, drip' it, they should release it all first in hashed form, so that: 1. We ultimately know we get it all. 2. We know it hasn't been modified from the form it was originally in. Jim Bell
