> corp will take the fall for the leak. The leak is out there, but the > corp dies of negligience or something, rather than from a stand > up principled fight. That's not a win.
"Halt and catch fire" is a pretty good defense, I think. It's why Lavabit shut down, after all; it is *better* to crash and burn than become a cog of oppression. On 01/06/14 06:03, grarpamp wrote: > On Sat, May 31, 2014 at 2:53 PM, jim bell <[email protected]> wrote: >> https://www.google.com/#q=corporation+cannot+conspire+with+itself >> deliver a copy of that NSL letter to each of its employees >> Obviously, that news will leak. >> Prosecution of any specific corporate employee will be difficult >> without very detailed evidence. > > As in the search results... whoever was leaking employee is > irrelevant, the employee is the corp. If an employee cannot be > found *and* successfully treated separately from the corp, the > corp will take the fall for the leak. The leak is out there, but the > corp dies of negligience or something, rather than from a stand > up principled fight. That's not a win. > >> The issue will arise: Can a corporation legally deliver a copy of >> that NSL to each employee? > > Probably depends on how the letter is worded / addressed. > The default sense in absense of such restrictions would seem > to be yes. > > Find bitcoin accepting lawyer to do construction/opinion for > cpunks list. > -- T: @onetruecathal, @IndieBBDNA P: +353876363185 W: http://indiebiotech.com
0x988B9099.asc
Description: application/pgp-keys
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
