What about streaming, which is increasingly used to hold power to account in real time? Or other rich, necessarily large media which needs to *get out fast*? Big media isn't always frivolous. Even frivolity is important, and a mixnet without fun is gonna be a small mixnet.
On 2 June 2014 02:33:56 GMT+01:00, [email protected] wrote: >> Message du 01/06/14 20:37 >> De : "grarpamp" >> >> In May 2014 someone wrote: >> >> > p2p is no panacea, it doesn't scale >> >> >> >> I believe it could. Even if requiring super aggregating >> >> nodes of some sort. Layers of service of the whole >> >> DHT space. More research is surely required. >> >> > It is not possible to have fast p2p unless: >> > - Cable networks collaborate by increasing bandwidth 7 to 8 times >> >> My references to scale were not intended to be about... >> bulk bandwidth across such networks (for example, right >> now, I2P and Tor are doing well enough to see very low >> quality video between their hidden nodes if you get a lucky >> path, and well enough for moving large files around in non >> realtime). ie: the nodes have bandwidth available. >> > >We all wish privacy, not necessarily 4k videos. The current bandwidth >can provide for 4k videos and also privacy, no matter if a littler >slower, for a little chat, work and file transfers. > >Except if you are into media production or warez, the current bandwidth >already does the trick for all the rest. -- Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
