Dnia środa, 1 października 2014 17:54:26 Douglas Lucas pisze: > On 10/01/2014 01:57 PM, rysiek wrote: > > Dnia poniedziałek, 29 września 2014 09:08:48 Douglas Lucas pisze: > >> I have a historical question. In 2007, anywhere from January to > >> September, what TLDs were regarded as the most pirate-friendly or > >> journalism-friendly or safest from takedowns of whatever stripe, e.g. > >> the sort of DHS DMCA takedowns we have now, etc.? > > > > Might I enquire what could possibly the reason to ask such a question? > > I am writing a short story. There is a scene set in 2007, roughly > October. Two characters disagree on what TLD to get to provide material > to others. One wants a .com to sell the stuff. The other wants the most > non-capitalist, pro-freedom TLD possible. The difference characterizes > the two individuals.
Cool! Thanks, would love to read your story! :) But maybe, as garpgarp pointed out already, the more freedom-loving individual could remark on how any domain is a liability and they should at least have an alternative in the form of an .onion address. Just a thought. -- Pozdr rysiek
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
